Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Queer(y)ing consummation: an empirical reflection on the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Act 2013 and the role of consummation
Alexander Maine, Lecturer in Law, Leicester Law School, University of LeicesterKeywords: Consummation – adultery – marriage – empirical research – LGBTQConsummation and...
A v A (Return Without Taking Parent) [2021] EWHC 1439 (Fam)
(Family Division, MacDonald J, 18 May 2021)Abduction – Application for return order under Hague Convention 1980 - Art 13(b) defence – Whether mother’s allegations against the father...
Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers
The Insurance Charities have released an update to the Domestic Abuse Toolkit for Employers.Employers have a duty of care and a legal responsibility to provide a safe and effective work...
Two-week rapid consultation launched on remote, hybrid and in-person family hearings
The President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, has announced the launch of a two-week rapid consultation on remote, hybrid and in-person hearings in the family justice system and the...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
View all articles
Authors

Islington to appeal registrar judgment

Sep 29, 2018, 17:24 PM
Slug : 18-07-2008-islington-to-appeal-registrar-judgment
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 18, 2008, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89883

Islington Council has announced it will appeal against a judgment which decided it had bullied and discriminated against a Christian registrar. If the ruling is upheld, it would set a legal precedent binding on other employment tribunals.

Miss Lillian Ladele was threatened with the sack and intimidated at work because she asked if she could be exempt from registering homosexual civil partnerships, the tribunal ruled.

The unanimous judgment published last week also said it was discriminatory to require Miss Ladele to act against her religious beliefs.

But in an announcement this week, Islington Council said they will lodge an appeal against the decision.

In a statement the Council's said: "The decision was taken after careful consideration of the legal ruling made by the London Central Employment Tribunal."

Cllr John Gilbert said: "This isn't a decision we've taken lightly, but we believe an important question is at stake and the law must be clarified.

"Islington Council, like all councils and employers, needs to know whether we can expect employees to provide services to all sections of the community, regardless of who they are."

The council has been able to provide, in its own words, a "first class" civil partnership service to homosexual couples even though Miss Ladele has not taken part.

It is not yet known on what grounds the council will appeal.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from