Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
JM v RM [2021] EWHC 315 (Fam)
(Family Division, Mostyn J, 22 February 2021)Abduction – Wrongful retention – Hague Convention application – Mother decided not to return to Australia with children – COVID 19...
Re A (A Child) (Hague Convention 1980: Set Aside) [2021] EWCA Civ 194
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Moylan, Asplin LJJ, Hayden J, 23 February 2021)Abduction – Hague Convention 1980 – Return order made – Mother successfully applied to set aside due...
Disabled women more than twice as likely to experience domestic abuse
The latest data from the Office of National Statistics shows that, in the year ending March 2020, around 1 in 7 (14.3%) disabled people aged 16 to 59 years experienced any form of domestic abuse in...
The President of the Family Division endorses Public Law Working Group report
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has published a message from the President of the Family Division, Sir Andrew McFarlane, in which the President endorses the publication of the President’s...
HMCTS updates online divorce services guidance
HM Courts and Tribunals Service have recently updated the online divorce services guidance with the addition of guides for deemed and dispensed service applications, alternative service...
View all articles
Authors

Islington to appeal registrar judgment

Sep 29, 2018, 17:24 PM
Slug : 18-07-2008-islington-to-appeal-registrar-judgment
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 18, 2008, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89883

Islington Council has announced it will appeal against a judgment which decided it had bullied and discriminated against a Christian registrar. If the ruling is upheld, it would set a legal precedent binding on other employment tribunals.

Miss Lillian Ladele was threatened with the sack and intimidated at work because she asked if she could be exempt from registering homosexual civil partnerships, the tribunal ruled.

The unanimous judgment published last week also said it was discriminatory to require Miss Ladele to act against her religious beliefs.

But in an announcement this week, Islington Council said they will lodge an appeal against the decision.

In a statement the Council's said: "The decision was taken after careful consideration of the legal ruling made by the London Central Employment Tribunal."

Cllr John Gilbert said: "This isn't a decision we've taken lightly, but we believe an important question is at stake and the law must be clarified.

"Islington Council, like all councils and employers, needs to know whether we can expect employees to provide services to all sections of the community, regardless of who they are."

The council has been able to provide, in its own words, a "first class" civil partnership service to homosexual couples even though Miss Ladele has not taken part.

It is not yet known on what grounds the council will appeal.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from