Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Practical aspects to assessing competence in children
Rebecca Stevens, Partner, Royds Withy KingThis is an article regarding the practical aspects to assessing competence in children. The article explores a range of practicalities, such as meeting a...
Scrumping the crop of recent pension decisions
Rhys Taylor, 36 Family and 30 Park PlaceJonathan Galbraith, Mathieson Consulting2020 has thus far proved to be a memorable year for all the wrong reasons, but nonetheless it remains an interesting one...
Conduct in financial remedies – when is it now a relevant consideration?
Rachel Gillman, 1 GC/Family LawThis article provides an overview of all aspects of financial misconduct following the recent decision of Mostyn J in OG v AG [2020] EWFC 52, wherein all aspects of...
The treatment of RSUs/Stock Options in light of XW v XH
Peter Mitchell QC, 29 Bedford RowStock Options and Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) are frequently encountered by the Family Court when dividing property on divorce or dissolution of a Civil Partnership....
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
View all articles
Authors

Islington to appeal registrar judgment

Sep 29, 2018, 17:24 PM
Slug : 18-07-2008-islington-to-appeal-registrar-judgment
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 18, 2008, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 89883

Islington Council has announced it will appeal against a judgment which decided it had bullied and discriminated against a Christian registrar. If the ruling is upheld, it would set a legal precedent binding on other employment tribunals.

Miss Lillian Ladele was threatened with the sack and intimidated at work because she asked if she could be exempt from registering homosexual civil partnerships, the tribunal ruled.

The unanimous judgment published last week also said it was discriminatory to require Miss Ladele to act against her religious beliefs.

But in an announcement this week, Islington Council said they will lodge an appeal against the decision.

In a statement the Council's said: "The decision was taken after careful consideration of the legal ruling made by the London Central Employment Tribunal."

Cllr John Gilbert said: "This isn't a decision we've taken lightly, but we believe an important question is at stake and the law must be clarified.

"Islington Council, like all councils and employers, needs to know whether we can expect employees to provide services to all sections of the community, regardless of who they are."

The council has been able to provide, in its own words, a "first class" civil partnership service to homosexual couples even though Miss Ladele has not taken part.

It is not yet known on what grounds the council will appeal.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Authors
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from