(Family Court, Baker J, 19 June 2018)
Publicity and reporting – Financial remedies – Unwelcome publicity – Successful business – Child suffering from rare genetic condition – Application for reporting restriction order opposed by media
The court made a reporting restriction order precluding the publication of any information relating to the proceedings save for an anonymised and redacted version of the judgment of Baker J.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.Subscribers can log in here.Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWFC 44
Case No: ZC15D04000
IN THE FAMILY COURT
IN THE MATTER OF THE MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT 1973
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE SENIOR COURTS ACT 1981
AND IN THE MATTER OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 19 June 2018
Before :
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between :
XW
Applicant
- and -
XH
(No.2)
Respondent
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Desmond Browne QC, Lucy Stone QC, Duncan Brooks and Caroline Addy (instructed by Stewarts Law LLP) for the Petitioner
Martin Pointer QC and Rebecca Carew Pole (instructed by Sears Tooth) for the Respondent
Hearing date: 26 February 2018
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judgment Approved
This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the parties and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
Judgment: XW and XH (No 2) [2018] EWFC 44.rtf
