David Bedingfield, barrister at 4 Paper Buildings, discusses how the court came to decide that it was in the best interests of twins to be separated for adoption, following ‘incompetence and serial failings’ by the local authority.
Prospective Adopters for BT and another v County of Herefordshire District Council and others (A Local Authority and others intervening)  EWFC 76
This case affirms that judges in care proceedings must determine the best interests of a child at the time of the hearing—the child’s current reality is the starting point. There is no assumption that the child’s birth family is the appropriate placement or in the best interests of the child. There is no ‘right’ that trumps the command in the Children Act 1989 and the Adoption and Children Act 2002 that the welfare of the child is the court’s paramount consideration.
Local authorities must be transparent with regard to all decisions made affecting children in their care and meetings must be minuted. Systems should be set up to ensure there are regular reviews of care plans for children in care. Those care plans must be followed, unless the welfare of the child requires they be changed. If they are changed, reasons must be clearly set out and supported.
Want to access the rest of this story? To read the balance of this article click here (subscription required). This news analysis was first published by LexisPSL Family. To request a free one week trial click here.