Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Read on

Unfair marital agreements, chaos of EU law and unusual routes to fairness: DB v PB [2016] EWHC 3431 (Fam)

Date:30 JAN 2017
Third slide
Family lawyer

An  English High Court decision reported late last week has highlighted several  real jurisdictional obstacles to producing a straightforward and obvious fair  outcome.  The judge had to overcome the  'technical' obstacles presented by the EU Maintenance Regulation.  He used a statutory device described as an  'unusual' route normally used only by nonmarried cohabitants.  En route he also covered the jurisprudential  issue of needs and sharing in present English family law and how a court should  deal with a marital agreement it has found is unfair.  

 After a long relationship with assets of about £11  million the husband argued the wife should have about £650 000.  The court was satisfied a fair outcome was a  starting point of one half.  How could it  produce as close to a fair outcome as possible despite the various obstacles?

Introduction

Ever since the EU Maintenance Regulation was introduced in June 2011 there has been the prospect of different aspects of the affairs of a family on relationship breakdown being dealt with in different countries.  The divorce pursuant to the jurisdiction under Brussels II.  Maintenance needs pursuant to the...

Read the full article here.