Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Jade Quirke
Jade Quirke
Family Solicitor
Read on
Thum v Thum [2019] EWFC 25
Date:24 APR 2019
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Family Court, Mostyn J, 16 April 2019)

Practice and procedure – Disclosure – Disclosure order – Non-compliance – FLR 4.1(6)/ s 31F)(6), Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984

The husband’s application under FPR 4.1(6) and/or s 31F(6) of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 for an order varying or revoking the disclosure order was refused.

 


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWFC 25

Case No: ZC15D04127

IN THE FAMILY COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 16/04/2019

Before :

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

CATIA MARION THUM
Applicant

- and -

OLIVER THUM

Respondent

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Rebecca Carew Pole (instructed by Katz Partners LLP) for the Applicant
Philip Marshall QC (instructed by Farrer & Co) for the Respondent

Hearing date: 10 April 2019


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children of the family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

 

Judgment: Thum v Thum [2019] EWFC 25

 

Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99
Family Law Awards 2019
Family Law Awards 2019
Winners announced