Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Zahra Pabani
Zahra Pabani
Partner - Family Law
Read on
The Steinfeld Effect: Equal Civil Partnerships and the Construction of the Cohabitant
Date:22 SEP 2019

Keywords: Civil partnerships – marriage – cohabitation - Steinfeld and Keidan  


The full version of this article will appear in Child and Family Law Quarterly, Vol 31, No  4

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Child and Family Law Quarterly. Please quote: 100482.


The Civil Partnerships, Marriages and Deaths (Registration etc) Act 2019 places the Secretary of State under an obligation to reform the currently same-sex only Civil Partnership Act 2004 so as to enable access by different-sex couples. It was introduced in the wake of multiple Private Members Bills, public petitions and a recent Supreme Court decision in Steinfeld and Keidan. A key element underpinning this campaign for reform is the assertion that opening such status to different-sex couples will offer beneficial legal protections to cohabitants. Clearly motivated by the exponential rise in cohabitation, this prominent narrative in the parliamentary debates, government reports and media coverage has positioned civil partnerships as a solution to the absence of comprehensive statutory cohabitation reform, which is widely viewed as a pressing issue yet one that to date no political party has tackled. This article interrogates the assumptions underpinning this narrative and reveals that conceptualising civil partnerships as a means of giving more comprehensive legal protections to cohabitants is not a recent phenomenon in England and Wales. However, through tracing the depiction of cohabitation to the present day, this article argues that caution should be exercised in terms of precisely how far civil partnerships can combat relationship-generated disadvantage. Moreover, this article questions whether the modern construction of ‘the cohabitant’ beneficiary used in the equal civil partnerships narrative adequately acknowledges the myriad of cohabiting relationships or, instead, entrenches even further a monolithic understanding of interpersonal relationships premised on a marital model.

Article continues below...
Family Law Awards 2019
Family Law Awards 2019
Winners announced
Child and Family Law Quarterly
Child and Family Law Quarterly
"The final professional word for the practitioner...
£80
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99
This article has been accepted for publication in Child and Family Law Quarterly in Issue 4, Vol 31, Year 2019. The final published version of this article will be published and made publicly available here 24 months after its publication date, under a CC-BY-NC licence.
Categories:
Articles CFLQ