Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email emma.reitano@lexisnexis.co.uk.
Spotlight

The implications of Abbasi on injunctive orders restraining publicity related to public law children cases

Date:14 OCT 2025
Third slide

James Dove, Harcourt Chambers

In this article, James Dove examines how the Supreme Court’s decision in Abbasi v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Haastrup v King’s College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust [2025] UKSC 15 could reshape the approach to anonymity and reporting restrictions in public law children cases.

The judgment clarifies the limits of the court’s power to grant injunctions restraining publicity and raises important questions about the continued protection of social workers, guardians and clinicians under current model transparency orders. James suggests that the President of the Family Division and the Transparency Implementation Group may need to revisit those orders to ensure they remain consistent with the principles set out in Abbasi.

James practises from Harcourt Chambers and specialises in complex care proceedings involving serious injuries, fictitious or induced illness, and sexual abuse, as well as deprivation of liberty and Court of Protection cases.


The full article has published in the September issue of Family Law.  Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482


Read the full article here.