Andrew Bainham's article in the September issue of Family Law ( Fam Law 1150) explores the tension between the powers of the court and the statutory duties of the local authority in public law children cases. Just as the court must not enter the forbidden territory of the local authority so the local authority must not trespass on the forbidden territory of the court. Hence there are two forbidden territories and the search is for where the border truly lies.
The author begins by looking at two Court of Appeal authorities Re W (Care Proceedings: Functions of Court and Local Authority)  EWCA Civ 1227  2 FLR 431 and Re T (A Child) (Placement Order)  EWCA Civ 650  FLR (forthcoming). These decisions establish that a local authority’s decision-making might be susceptible to judicial review where it fails to give effect to a court’s welfare decision. He argues that this falls short of providing any over-arching theory or guidance on the legitimate extent of the court’s scrutiny of and directions regarding care plans.
The key to a clearer understanding of the court’s role derives from the ‘permanence provisions’...
Read the full article here.