Shona Alexander, Charles Russell Speechlys
The family farm is more than a business; it is a legacy, often spanning generations. Yet when relationships break down, whether through divorce or disputes between siblings and generations, that legacy can quickly become a battlefield.
Family farms frequently operate through a patchwork of companies, partnerships, tenancies and trusts, with governance shaped more by tradition than by documentation. When conflict arises, this informality collides with the rigid frameworks of family and company law, creating disputes that are costly, destabilising and deeply personal.
In this comprehensive article, family law partner Shona Alexander and agricultural dispute resolution specialist Maddie Dunn from Charles Russell Speechlys examine the unique vulnerabilities of farming businesses when relationships sour. They explore how unfair prejudice claims operate, when a farming company may be treated as a quasi-partnership, and how the Family Court approaches agricultural assets on divorce. Crucially, they address the procedural interplay between the Family Court and the Business and Property Courts and offer practical guidance on protective measures, governance reforms and settlement strategies.
The full article has published in the April issue of Family Law. Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482
Read the full article here.


