We use Cookies to deliver our online, application, and email services. Details on the cookies we use and instructions on how to disable them are set out in our Cookie Policy. Either click "Agree" to our use of these cookies, or, simply continue browsing. AGREE

29 Bedford Row , 12 JUN 2018

The Child Maintenance Service: a step backwards

Jonathan Tod

Barrister

The Child Maintenance Service: a step backwards

Jonathan's article, featured in the June 2018 issue of Family Law ([2018] Fam Law 734), highlights some of the shortcomings in the Child Maintenance Service. In particular, the decision to omit from the revised ‘variation’ provisions application of an 8% notional return from capital assets outside of the NRP’s main home (the ‘assets’ ground for variation) and the ‘lifestyle inconsistent with stated means’ ground. NRPs who are capital rich/income poor, have elaborate tax avoidance schemes in place, or receive a large amounts of income in ‘cash’ are once again paying little or no child maintenance.  Whilst highlighting to the specialist professionals the fact that these provisions are omitted, Jonathan implores the government to urgently reinstate these provisions so that injustice for the children of unmarried parents no longer prevails. 


The full version of this article appears in the June 2018 issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.
Child and Family Law Quarterly

Child and Family Law Quarterly

"The final professional word for the practitioner in family and child law" Phillip Taylor MBE...

More Info from £80.00
Available in Lexis®Library

Family Law Awards

Nominations deadline extended to 15 June

The Ballroom South Bank, 99 Upper Ground, Doon Street Car Park
Subscribe to our newsletters