We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. Disable them/read more. By continuing or closing this message you agree to the use of cookies. CLOSE

29 Bedford Row, 12 JUN 2018

The Child Maintenance Service: a step backwards

Jonathan Tod

Barrister

The Child Maintenance Service: a step backwards

Jonathan's article, featured in the June 2018 issue of Family Law ([2018] Fam Law 734), highlights some of the shortcomings in the Child Maintenance Service. In particular, the decision to omit from the revised ‘variation’ provisions application of an 8% notional return from capital assets outside of the NRP’s main home (the ‘assets’ ground for variation) and the ‘lifestyle inconsistent with stated means’ ground. NRPs who are capital rich/income poor, have elaborate tax avoidance schemes in place, or receive a large amounts of income in ‘cash’ are once again paying little or no child maintenance.  Whilst highlighting to the specialist professionals the fact that these provisions are omitted, Jonathan implores the government to urgently reinstate these provisions so that injustice for the children of unmarried parents no longer prevails. 


The full version of this article appears in the June 2018 issue of Family Law

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of Family Law journal. Please quote: 100482.
Family Law Awards

Family Law Awards

2018

Buy a ticket or book a table today

Child and Family Law Quarterly

Child and Family Law Quarterly

"The final professional word for the practitioner in family and child law" Phillip Taylor MBE and Elizabeth Taylor, Richmond Green Chambers

More Info £80