Earlier this year, the Office for National Statistics (‘ONS’) published its first ‘compendium’ of statistics for child abuse in England and Wales, for the year ending March 2019. As it contains some truly appalling figures, I thought I should take a closer look.
As the ONS states, the statistics bring together a range of different data sources from across government and the voluntary sector, “with the aim of providing a better understanding of child abuse than is possible from looking at individual data sources.” The statistics were produced by the ONS, working in collaboration with the Department for Education, the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, and the Welsh Government.
I will set out in full the five main points:
These are truly appalling findings, although perhaps for a jaded family law hack like myself perhaps not entirely surprising. To think that one in five adults in this country experienced child abuse is just horrendous. Child abuse is an epidemic, which we must all strive to eradicate.
As this blog is aimed towards private law matters, rather than public law (i.e. care proceedings), I want to concentrate upon the private law aspects, in particular relating to the issue of children suffering or witnessing domestic abuse.
The Crime Survey referred to in paragraph 1 above breaks down the figures into different types of abuse. We are told, for example, that nearly 10% had experienced emotional abuse, that 7.6% experienced emotional abuse, and that nearly 10% witnessed domestic violence or abuse. We are also told that just under half of the victims experienced more than one type of abuse.
And then let’s think about paragraph 5 above, which must resonate with all family lawyers. Domestic abuse is self-perpetuating. How many times have we heard of abusers and the abused alike suffering or witnessing abuse as children? If it is the ‘norm’ in childhood, it will become the norm in adulthood. Breaking this cycle is one of the hardest tasks, and as I suggested here recently, education must surely have to play a large role in that task.
What else can we learn from the statistics? Well, as the ONS warn, caution is needed when interpreting the figures, but they suggest (amongst other things) that women were more likely than men to have experienced abuse before the age of 16 years, that adults with a disability were around twice as likely to have experienced abuse before the age of 16 years, and that lesbian, gay or bisexual adults were more likely to have experienced abuse before the age of 16 years. Perhaps these matters, which again are not entirely surprising, could inform our response to the child abuse epidemic.
Hopefully, this publication will become a regular thing and will help us all understand the nature, extent and effect of the scourge of child abuse.
You can find the ONS release here.
This article was first published at www.stowefamilylaw.co.uk and is reproduced with permission.