Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
A day in the life Of...
Edward Bennett
Edward Bennett
Read on
FINANCIAL RELIEF/COSTS: RH v RH (Costs (Adjustments for Gross Disparity) [2008] EWHC 347
Date:27 FEB 2008

(Family Division; Singer J; 27 February 2008)

In view of the significant disparity between the parties' costs, the judge effectively wrote back into the husband's assets £225,000 of the husband's costs, on the basis that he had overspent. In effect, the husband's ancillary relief award was reduced by £225,000.

An offer made by the husband, but ignored by the wife, ought to have been taken into account, however, it was not just that the wife should pay all the husband's costs from the date of the offer, given that the husband's approach to the litigation had verged on the obsessional. The wife should pay the husband's costs in the fixed sum of £150,000.