New research from Stowe Family Law and Slater and Gordon highlights growing financial complexity in divorce cases across England and Wales, alongside evidence of ongoing economic pressures affecting separating couples.
Data compiled by Stowe Family Law points to a pronounced regional divide, with eight of the ten most financially complex divorce cases occurring in southern England. The firm’s “Financially Complex Divorce Index,” which draws on data from bodies including HM Revenue and Customs, Department for Work and Pensions, HM Land Registry, Ministry of Justice and the Office for National Statistics, identifies London as the most complex jurisdiction for divorce.
The index suggests divorces in London are nearly five times more financially complex than those in the North East of England, reflecting higher concentrations of property wealth, investment assets, business interests and pension accumulation. While cases in lower-value regions may involve the division of a single property and savings, those in the South East and surrounding areas more frequently require specialist valuation of multiple and sometimes international assets.
Separate findings from Slater and Gordon indicate that financial pressures are also affecting post-separation living arrangements. A survey of 2,000 UK adults found that around one in five divorced couples continue to live together after separation, often due to affordability constraints.
Only 24% of respondents reported moving out of the family home within the first month of separation, with the average time to leave standing at seven months. For individuals aged over 55, this increased to 20 months, and nearly a third reported not moving out at all.
Cost-of-living pressures were cited as a key factor, with 35% identifying expenses as a barrier to separation and 26% reporting insufficient savings to support moving out or initiating divorce proceedings. Joint property ownership was also identified as a significant obstacle.
The research further highlights the emotional impact of prolonged cohabitation following separation. Among respondents, 43% reported increased stress and anxiety, while over a third said delays exacerbated conflict and contributed to more acrimonious proceedings.
Jenniffer Brunt of Slater and Gordon noted that financial circumstances play a central role in shaping how couples navigate separation, with no single approach suitable for all families.
The findings underline the intersection between financial complexity and access to resolution in family law, particularly as economic conditions continue to influence both the structure and duration of divorce proceedings.
