(Family Division, Williams J, 29 January 2019)
Private law children – Contact – Termination – Appeal
The father’s appeal was allowed in part, the order for indirect contact was continued and the s 91(14) order was discharged.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Subscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
Neutral Citation Number: [2019] EWHC 132 (Fam)
Case No: 2018/0134
FAMILY DIVISION
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 29/01/2019
Between :
ME
Applicant
- and -
MP
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
(Appeal: Termination of Contact)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Nasstassia Hylton (instructed as Direct Access Counsel Pro Bono) for the Applicant
Richard Egleton (instructed as Direct Access Counsel Pro Bono) for the 1st Respondent
Katie Phillips (instructed by Harney & Wells) for the 2nd Respondent
Hearing dates: 11 December 2018
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Approved Judgment
I direct that pursuant to FPR 27.9 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.
.............................
MR JUSTICE WILLIAMS
Judgment: Re R (A Child: Appeal: Termination of Contact) [2019] EWHC 132
