Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
Re L (Children) [2016] EWCA Civ 1110
Date:30 NOV 2016
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Court of Appeal, Underhill, King LJJ, 20 September 2016)

Public law children – Interim care order – Balance of harm – Unknown whether a placement would be able to cater for child’s needs

The appeal from an interim care order was allowed.

The local authority became involved with the family in 2009 due to concerns regarding the condition of the home and the mental health, supervision, and the behaviour of one of the children, PL, and his siblings towards one another. It was accepted by the parties that autistic traits were prevalent in the family but no formal diagnosis of the children had been made.

The judge considering an interim care order found that the local authority had failed to intervene when it should have done so in relation to the older siblings and the situation for PL was deteriorating in a similar manner. Although PL’s suspected autism would make it more difficult for him to settle in another home, allowing him to remain at home would compromise his safety and would not be in his best interests.

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal from the interim care order. The evidence before the judge did not reveal any imminent or immediate risk to PL which required his removal from home. The judge needed to be in a position to evaluate the risk of distress and emotional damage to PL that would be cause by his removal from the family and he needed to know whether an alternative placement was achievable that would cater to his needs. The decision had been taken without any of that information and the judge had, therefore, been in error. An interim supervision order was substituted and the case was remitted for rehearing.



B4/2016/3056 
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWCA Civ 1110
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM CAMBRIDGE COUNTY COURT AND FAMILY COURT
(HHJ YELTON)

Royal Courts of Justice 
Strand
London, WC2A 2LL 


Tuesday, 20 September 2016

B E F O R E:


LORD JUSTICE UNDERHILL 


LADY JUSTICE KING 

------------------------------------------


IN THE MATTER OF: 


L (CHILDREN) 


------------------------------------------


(DAR Transcript of
WordWave International Limited
Trading as DTI 
8th Floor, 165 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2DY 
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
Official Shorthand Writers to the Court) 

------------------------------------------

Miss Hilary Pollock (instructed by Brendan Fleming) appeared on behalf of the Applicant 
Mr Graham Crosthwaite (instructed by Cambridgeshire County Council) appeared on behalf of the Respondent 

------------------------------------------
J U D G M E N T 
(Approved)
Crown copyright©


Re L (Children) [2016] EWCA Civ 1110.rtf
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99
Family Law
Family Law
"the principal (monthly) periodical dealing with...
£389
Financial Remedies Handbook
Financial Remedies Handbook
Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook...
£91.99