Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Zahra Pabani
Zahra Pabani
Partner - Family Law
Read on
LEAVE TO REMOVE: Re G (Leave to Remove) [2007] EWCA Civ 1497
Date:11 DEC 2007

(Court of Appeal; Thorpe, Arden and Wall LJJ; 11 December 2007)

The father sought permission to appeal the judge's order granting the mother leave to relocate to Germany, arguing that some judges were misapplying Payne v Payne [2001] FLR 1052, in that they were inappropriately prioritising the impact of refusal on the primary carer, and disregarding modern views on the importance of co-parenting.

The Court refused permission to appeal. It was not possible to argue that the decision in Payne v Payne was being widely misunderstood; it was only possible to argue that, in a particular case, the judge had correctly or incorrectly understood and applied the principles. In any event the experience of the Court was that the principles enunciated in Payne were well understood and had been of assistance to trial judges.