Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Rebecca Delaney
Rebecca Delaney
Director & Partner
Read on
PS v BP [2018] EWHC 1987 (Fam)
Date:1 AUG 2018
Third slide
Technical Editor

(High Court, Hayden J, 27 July 2018)

Evidence– Father’s application for Child Arrangements Order - Serious allegations made by mother against father – Father acting as litigant in person, not allowed to cross-examine mother – Father appealed

The High Court allowed the appeal.




For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWHC 1987 (Fam)
Case No: ME17P00309
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
ON APPEAL FROM HIS HONOUR JUDGE SCARATT sitting in the Family Court at Canterbury

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 27/07/2018

Before :


THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE HAYDEN


 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Between :


PS
Appellant


- and -


BP
Respondent


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Mr L Eaton (instructed by Aletta Shaw Solicitors) for the Appellant
Mr P Hepher (instructed by Brachers LLP) for the Respondent


Hearing date: 18th June 2018


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Judgment Approved


This judgment was delivered in public. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Judgment: PS v BP [2018] EWHC 1987 (Fam).rtf

Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99
Financial Remedies Handbook
Financial Remedies Handbook
Formerly entitled the Ancillary Relief Handbook...
£91.99
Family Law
Family Law
"the principal (monthly) periodical dealing with...
£389