Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Rebecca Delaney
Rebecca Delaney
Director & Partner
Read on
No early closing for forum shopping: Mittal v Mittal
Date:5 DEC 2013

Charlotte Sanders, Solicitor, Vardags:

The decision of the Court of Appeal in Mittal v Mittal [2013] EWCA 1255, [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming)  has confirmed that the English courts have jurisdiction to stay matrimonial proceedings in England where there are parallel proceedings in a non-Member State. In deciding this, the Court has made clear that the controversial civil case of Owusu v Jackson [2005] QB 801 does not apply in the family context, settling the academic debate that has been raging since its decision.

Although the judgment deals with technical and complex legal arguments, it is a hugely relevant and important decision in an era where the English courts are seen as the divorce capital of the world, but where families are increasingly international. Family practitioners should take note.

The full version of this article appears in the December 2013 issue of Family Law.

Categories:
Articles