Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families: A Legal Handbook
More info
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity: Law and Practice
More info
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
More info
View All
A day in the life Of...
Read on

Minwalla v Minwalla: Straining the Limits of Comity

© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Date:10 OCT 2005

Timothy Hanson and Mark Renouf, Associate Members of No 5 Chambers, Birmingham and Advocates of the Royal Court of Jersey. The authors examine the Jersey courts approach to enforcement of the orders made in the recent High Court case, Minwalla v Minwalla and others [2004] EWHC 2823 (Fam),[2005] 1 FLR 771. The Royal Court of Jersey had to consider the extent to which the declaration that a Jersey trust was a sham, together with the other consequential orders made, should be recognised and enforced as a matter of comity. See October [2005] Fam Law 794 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.

Read the full article here.

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis