Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families: A Legal Handbook
More info
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity: Law and Practice
More info
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
More info
View All
A day in the life Of...
Read on

Miller/McFarlane and MacLeod - The Duality of Law-making

© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Date:30 APR 2009

Miles Geffin, Professional Support Lawyer, Mishcon de Reya

In MacLeod v MacLeod (Isle of Man) [2008] UKPC 64, [2009] 1 FLR 641, the Board of the Privy Council held that 'the difficult issue of the validity and effect of ante-nuptial agreements is more appropriate to legislative rather than judicial development'. The purpose of this article is to explore why the Law Lords were bound to exercise their judicial function to develop social policy in Miller v Miller, McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] UKHL 24, [2006] 1 FLR 1186 whilst, in MacLeod, bound to defer to Parliament on the validity on ante-nuptial agreements.

To read the rest of this article, see May [2009] Family Law journal.

To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here.

Read the full article here.

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis