Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
A day in the life Of...
Kara Swift
Kara Swift
Read on

Lesbian co-parents: still not real mothers

Date:6 DEC 2013

Lucy Yeatman, Senior Lecturer, School of Law, University of Greenwich:

The common law's emphasis on the genetic parenthood has been undermined by advancements in reproductive technologies. In response, the Human Embryology and Fertilisation Act 1990 was enacted and answered the question of legal parentage. However, as reproductive technology continued to develop, providing routes to parenthood using techniques such as embryonic screening and manipulation, it was apparent that HFEA 1990 was inappropriate. The solution was an amendment by way of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 which aimed to bring the law up to date with these advancements and set ethical boundaries. Although HFEA 2008 sets parameters for embryo research and reflects society's willingness to accept that the definition of the family has changed, it still retains a focus on two parent families. It has recently been announced that the UK will be set to become the first country to allow the creation of babies using DNA from three people. In backing this IVF technique, the Government has confirmed that this legislation, which re-enforces the common law model of the family, will have to yield to the demand for the legal recognition of parenthood which will be provided by the ongoing advancements in reproductive technology.    

The full version of this article appears in the December 2013 issue of Family Law.