Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
A day in the life Of...
Jade Quirke
Jade Quirke
Family Solicitor
Read on
Law, Discretion and Fact: Appeals in the Family Jurisdiction
Date:21 FEB 2006

David Burrows, Solicitor and Advocate. The disposal by Baroness Hale of Richmond of an appeal from the Court of Appeal, in Re J (Child Returned Abroad: Convention Rights) [2005] UKHL 40, [2005] 2 FLR 802 illuminates perfectly the subject of appeals and discretionary jurisdiction, subjects overlooked at their peril by all lawyers. The case concerned the summary return of a child to Saudi Arabia.

The Court of Appeal allowed the father's appeal on the ground that the judge had elevated his concern at the father's allegation above a level that the evidence justified. But, said Baroness Hale of Richmond (with whom the other four lords unanimously agreed), the judge's findings related to:

credibility and primary fact with which, for all the reasons explained by Lord Hoffman in [Piglowska v Piglowski [1999] 2 FLR 763, at 784], an appeal court is not entitled to interfere [and] once a judge has made such a finding, it becomes a factor to be weighed in the balance in the exercise of his discretion" (at paras [9] and [10]).

The author looks at other relevant cases regarding appeals. See March [2006] Fam Law 225 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.