Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce
and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email email@example.com
Late abortions following a diagnosis of Down’s Syndrome – the decision in the Court of Appeal
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Mary Welstead Visiting Professor in Family Law University of Buckingham
Heidi Crowter and Aidan Lea-Wilson who were born with Down’s Syndrome made a claim for judicial review of s1(1)(d) of the Abortion Act 1967 which permits the abortion of a foetus up until the moment of birth if there is a substantial risk that a seriously handicapped child might be born. Other pregnancies may only be terminated during the first twenty-four weeks unless the mother’s health or life is at risk. The Appellants maintained that the sub-section suggested that their lives were less valuable than others; it infringed their rights under the ECHR.
The decision has drawn attention to three important issues:
- The question of the time limit beyond which an abortion may not be sought. The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care expressed the view that late abortion: ‘raises profound social moral and ethical questions and there are irreconcilable views on all sides of the debate.’
- the view that a foetus has no rights but does have interests.
- The sub-section at issue was not about the rights of disabled...
Read the full article here.