Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
JURISDICTION/STAY OF PROCEEDINGS: Mittal v Mittal [2013] EWCA Civ 1255
Date:23 OCT 2013
Law Reporter

(Court of Appeal, Rimer, Jackson, Lewison LJJ, 18 October 2013)

The husband and wife, Indian nationals, married in India where the mother gave birth to a daughter. The husband moved to the UK and the wife and child followed the following year. When the marriage broke down the wife left the UK after her immigration appeal was refused. The husband initiated divorce proceedings in India and thereafter the wife issued divorce proceedings in England but those proceedings were stayed on the basis that India was a more appropriate forum. The wife appealed.

The appeal was dismissed. The wife's argument that the principle in Owusu v Jackson should be extended to the circumstances in this case was rejected. It could not be submitted that the proceedings were governed by BIIR since BIIR failed to provide for how the court should deal with such an application. The judge had not been precluded from granting a stay under para 9 of Sch 1 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973.