Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Edward Bennett
Edward Bennett
Barrister
Read on
JK v MK (E-Negotiation Ltd (trading as ‘amicable’) and another intervening) [2020] EWFC 2
Date:11 FEB 2020
Third slide
Technical Editor

(Family Court, Mostyn J, 20 January 2020)

Divorce – Procedure – Parties approaching company to help them navigate the divorce process

The Family Court held that there was no conflict of interest and nothing done by the company had violated the provisions of the Legal Services Act 2007.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.


Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWFC 2

Case No: EZ18D03488

IN THE FAMILY COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date: 20/01/2020

Before :

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

JK

Petitioner

- and -

MK

Respondent

-and-

E-Negotiation Ltd (trading as “amicable”)
The Queen’s Proctor

Interveners

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


The Petitioner and the Respondent appeared in person
Vikram Sachdeva QC (instructed by The International Family Law Group) for the First Intervener
Simon P G Murray (instructed by the Government Legal Department) for the Second Intervener

Hearing date: 19 December 2019

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Approved Judgment

I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

.............................

MR JUSTICE MOSTYN

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of JK & MK must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.

Judgment: JK v MK (E Negotiation Ltd (trading as 'amicable') and another intervening) [2020] EWFC 2

Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99