Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Sonny Patel
Sonny Patel
Partner
Read on
Jefferies v BMI Healthcare Ltd (Human Fertilisation And Embryology) [2016] EWHC 2493 (Fam)
Date:19 OCT 2016
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Family Division, Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, 12 October 2016)

Medical treatment – HFEA 1990 – Consent to storage of embryos – Husband died – Consent form amended to reduce consent to storage to 2 years but not signed – Application for a declaration that consent had been given for 10 years

The wife was granted a declaration that her deceased husband had provided proper consent to the storage of embryos for 10 years.

The husband and wife underwent two unsuccessful cycles of IVF treatment and were planning a third when the husband died suddenly. Prior to treatment they each signed consent forms authorising storage of embryos for 10 years. However, the clinic wrote to the wife after 2 years stating that the storage period was due to end and that the period could not be extended.

The wife sought a declaration that valid consent had been given for storage of embryos for 10 years. She submitted that the husband’s consent form had been subsequently amended to substitute a storage period of only 2 years, but that that amendment was not signed by the husband; that the amendment was therefore, as a matter of law, invalid; and that, accordingly, the consequence in law of what had happened was that the original consent for the period of 10 years remained.

The declaration was granted. The Form MT as originally signed was a valid consent to storage of embryos for 10 years under the 1990 Act. The subsequent amendment to a period of 2 years was not signed, in stark contrast, to every other amendment on the Form MT. The absence of a signature was sufficient to invalidate the amendment, as it did not comply with para 1(1) of Sch 3


Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 2493 (Fam)

Case No: FD16F00054

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 12 October 2016
Before:


SIR JAMES MUNBY PRESIDENT OF THE FAMILY DIVISION


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


In the Matter of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990


Between:


SAMANTHA JEFFERIES
Claimant


- and -


(1) BMI HEALTHCARE LIMITED
(2) HUMAN FERTILISATION AND EMBRYOLOGY AUTHORITY
Interested Parties

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


Ms Jenni Richards QC and Ms Rose Grogan (instructed by Hempsons) for the Claimant
Mr Harry Adamson (instructed by Blake Morgan) for the Second Interested Party
The First Interested Party was present but not represented


Hearing date: 28 September 2016

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved 
This judgment was handed down in open court

Jefferies v BMI Healthcare Ltd [2016] EWHC 2493 (Fam).rtf
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99
Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts
Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts
"A very good tool for the busy family lawyer"...
£519.99
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99