Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families: A Legal Handbook
More info
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity: Law and Practice
More info
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
More info
View All
A day in the life Of...
Kara Swift
Kara Swift
Associate
Read on

ANCILLARY RELIEF/PROPERTY: Irvine v Irvine [2006] EWHC 583 (Ch)

Date:31 MAR 2006

(Chancery Division; Blackburne J; 23 March 2006)

A minority shareholding in a company, even one where the extent of the minority was slight (one share in the instant case) was to be valued for what it was, a minority shareholding. Short of a quasi-partnership or some other exceptional circumstance, a minority discounted rate had to be applied when valuing the shares for a buy-out ordered by the court under s 459 of the Companies Act 1985.

Categories:
Archive Judgments
Copyright © 2020 LexisNexis