(Supreme Court, Hale, Carnwath, Black, Lloyd-Jones and Arden LJJ, 26 September 2019)
Medical treatment – Deprivation of liberty – Consent – Parental responsibility.
The Supreme Court held that parental consent could not substitute for the subjective requirement under article 5 ECHR for valid consent to the deprivation.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Subscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
THE COURT ORDERED that no one shall publish or reveal the name or address of the Appellant who is the subject of these proceedings or publish or reveal any information which would be likely to lead to the identification of the Appellant or of any member of his family in connection with these proceedings.
 UKSC 42
On appeal from:  EWCA Civ 1695
In the matter of D (A Child)
Lady Hale, President
JUDGMENT GIVEN ON
26 September 2019
Heard on 3 and 4 October 2018