Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
A day in the life Of...
Edward Bennett
Edward Bennett
Read on
His Honour Judge John Mitchell - Supporting Special Guardianship
Date:28 AUG 2008

His Honour Judge John Mitchell

Special guardianship orders (SGOs) were designed in part to provide a framework of permanency for 'children being cared for on a permanent basis by members of their wider birth family' (Adoption: A New Approach, Cm 5017 (TSO, 2000). The decision in April 2008 of Black J sitting in the Administrative Court in B v Lewisham London Borough Council [2008] EWHC 738(Admin), [2008] FLR (forthcoming) is the first reported case concerning the support which can and should be provided to special guardians (SGs) under s 14F of the Children Act 1989. It was delivered at an opportune time because two recent research studies J Hunt, S Waterhouse and E Lutman, Keeping Them in the Family: Outcomes for Abused and Neglected Children Placed with Family or Friends Carers through Care Proceedings (BAAF, 2008) (see [2008] Fam Law 435) and A Hall, Special Guardianship: a Missed Opportunity: Findings from Research [2008] Fam Law 148, draw attention to carers' needs for financial and other support.

There is little doubt that carers need more support than formerly offered. Hunt suggests that better service provision might have prevented half of the premature terminations of care and reduced the risk of termination in half of the vulnerable placements which were still continuing. One message from the research is that applicants who have not already had contact with social services as carers may underestimate the support that will be required and the difficulties they may experience in obtaining it. The purpose of this article is to provide a summary of the support available under s 14F and to give examples of support available for common problems.

For the full article, see August [2008] Family Law journal.