Post Separation Enhancement: B v B - Family Law journal

ASHLEY MURRAY Barrister Oriel Chambers Liverpool

There remain a number of areas in ancillary relief law which require better clarification and not least of these is the appropriate treatment of post separation resources and to what extent if at all it is fair to bring those resources into the s 25 assessments. The present position is the result of seven cases in which the approach to such resources have been treated differently to date namely Rossi v Rossi [2006] EWHC 1482 (Fam) [2007] 1 FLR 790 S v S (Ancillary Relief After Lengthy Separation) [2006] EWHC 2339 (Fam) [2007] 1 FLR 2120 H v H [2007] EWHC 459 (Fam) [2007] 2 FLR 548 P v P [2007] EWHC 2877 [2008] 2 FLR 1135 H v H [2008] EWHC 935 (Fam) [2008] 2 FLR 2092 CR v CR [2007] EWHC 3206 (Fam) [2008] 1 FLR 323 and H v H [2009] EWHC 494 (Fam) [2009] 2 FLR 795.

In Rossi as part endorsed by...

Read the full article here.