Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
A day in the life Of...
Kara Swift
Kara Swift
Read on

Use It or Lose It: Insolvency Act 1986, s 283A - Family Law journal

Date:30 JUL 2010

JANE CAMPBELL, Barrister, 6 Pump Court

Bankruptcy has become an increasingly prevalent feature in ancillary relief proceedings. Many practitioners are familiar with the following scenario: husband and wife are co-owners of their home, husband goes bankrupt and under Insolvency Act 1986, s 306: husband's interest vests in a trustee in bankruptcy. The matrimonial home has little value at the time so there is no application by the trustee to sell it. Husband and wife then continue to live there and, over time, start to believe that the trustee's lack of interest means the home is theirs. Many years later, when the value of the property has increased, the trustee reappears and applies for an order for sale.

It was to counter the perceived unfairness of this situation that the ‘use it or lose it' provisions for trustees in bankruptcy were introduced by the Enterprise Act 2003 and incorporated into the Insolvency Act 1986. Broadly speaking, the position is that a trustee has 3 years to make arrangements to sell a matrimonial home or seek an order for sale of a property. If he fails to do so within this time, the property reverts to the bankrupt. A difficulty for the trustee is that if the value of the bankrupt's interest is less than £1,000 (in practical terms if the property is in negative equity) the court must dismiss any application for sale whereupon the interest in the property reverts to the bankrupt.

As we enter another period of economic uncertainty, it is timely that the Court of Appeal has provided clarification of the ‘use it or lose it' provisions in Lewis v Metropolitan Property Realisations Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 448, [2010] 1 FLR 86. In part, the ruling here assists the bankrupt but it also identifies an important loophole, namely, if a trustee in bankruptcy sells his interest to a third party, that third party is not similarly constrained by the legislation. Unlike a trustee, he may hang on seemingly indefinitely before selling a property, as the 3 year time limit does not apply to him.

To read the rest of this article, see August [2010] Family Law journal (link for online subscribers who have logged in). To log on to Family Law journal Online or to request a free trial click here.


Family Law

Family Law is the leading practitioner journal, ensuring all family law professionals keep up with the latest developments and their impact on practice. Each issue contains the latest news of legislative change, authoritative case reports, invaluable articles and news items written and compiled by experts for the practising family law professional.