Nuptial settlements for the purposes of s 24(1)(c) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 have been said to be strange legal animals. A review of the case law reveals that they can crop up in all kinds of circumstances.
In this article Rhys Taylor
considers whether a family loan, used to help parties purchase a matrimonial home, which is then secured by a charge registered at the Land Registry, might fall within s 24(1)(c). The article explores this possibility and the likely consequences if a court found such a
loan to be a nuptial settlement.
Might the court then have the power to delay repayment of the loan or to vary the payment terms? This might provide a resource to assist where both parties’ housing needs exceed the available matrimonial pot.
The full version of this article appears in the March 2016 issue of Family Law.
Online subscribers can access the full version of the article here.
For details on how you can subscribe to Family Law or any other titles, please contact a member of our sales team: Tel 0117 917 5100, or email: email@example.com