Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
A day in the life Of...
Kara Swift
Kara Swift
Read on

Family Home: Doing Justice to the Parties

Date:2 MAY 2006

Mark Pawlowski, Professor of Property Law, University of Greenwich. Prior to the landmark Court of Appeal decision in Oxley v Hiscock [2004] EWCA Civ 546, [2004] 2 FLR 669, two divergent lines of authority had emerged for determining the quantum of beneficial interest arising under a constructive trust in the context of the family home. At one extreme, the parties equitable entitlement fell to be assessed by means of a strict arithmetical calculation of the parties respective financial contributions towards the acquisition of the property on the basis of a resulting trust; see, Springette v Defoe [1992] 2 FLR 388. Alternatively, a broader approach based on a determination of what is fair between the parties having regard to the whole course of dealing between them relevant to their ownership and occupation of the home (and their sharing of its burdens and advantages) was adopted in Midland Bank plc v Cooke [1995] 4 All ER 562 and Drake v Whipp [1996] 1 FLR 826. In Oxley, the Court of Appeal accepted this more robust analysis to quantification and rejected the strict resulting trust approach reflected in earlier case-law. See June [2006] Fam Law 462 for the full article.

Click here if you subscribe to the Family Law journal online.