Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email emma.reitano@lexisnexis.co.uk.
A day in the life Of...
Read on

Exploring the consultation and review on the taxation of trusts

Date:25 NOV 2018
Third slide
The government recently launched its consultation and review on making the taxation of trusts simpler, fairer and more transparent. Fiona Poole, partner at Maurice Turnor Gardner, examines the review in more detail. 
Family Law Awards 2023
Family Law Awards 2023
Winners announced!
Original news

The taxation of trusts—a review, LNB News 09/11/2018 4

HMRC has launched a consultation seeking views on a review of the government’s principles for taxing trusts, seeking views on the extent to which the current system meets those principles and possible areas for reform. The consultation closes on 30 January 2019.

What are the principles on which the review is based and does the review cover all types of trusts?

The government’s review of the taxation of trusts is the first of its kind looking at the overall system of taxation as it applies to both UK and non-UK resident trusts, their settlors, trustees and beneficiaries. One hopes that the review will tie in with the Office of Tax Simplification’s (OTS) call for evidence in relation to inheritance tax (IHT) which was published on 27 April 2018. The results of that call for evidence are expected to be published in autumn 2018 but were noticeably absent in the recent Budget 2018.

The government has stated that its proposed policy principles underpinning the taxation of trusts should be:

  1. transparency

  2. fairness and neutrality

  3. simplicity

These are in line with the government’s stated objectives in Autumn Budget 2017. However, as is evidenced, both from Budget 2018 and in the introduction to the consultation paper published on 7 November 2018, the objective appears to have shifted slightly. The government’s current intention is now ‘to ensure that the many UK individuals and companies using trusts legitimately benefit from a clear and transparent regime that is easy to understand, while also taking steps to ensure that trust taxation does not produce unfair outcomes and that the trust structures do not facilitate tax avoidance or evasion’.

The introduction of ‘unfair outcomes’ is said to apply equally to the tax collector as it does to a taxpayer.

It is of concern that is an addition to the list of unacceptable behaviours in the context of tax planning (also included is ‘aggressive’ tax planning), in that it represents a further move away from previously accepted court rulings that taxpayers may use any lawful means to reduce their tax bills and as a term, ‘unfair outcomes’ is unhelpfully undefined and vague. At least in 2016 HMRC published its own definition of tax avoidance, which ‘involves bending the rules of the tax system to gain an advantage that Parliament never intended’.

The government does not narrow its terms of reference by specifically addressing individual types of trust the review is to cover but it does refer to a number of different trusts in the appendix when looking at the different tax treatment that different types of trust currently attract, including:

  1. interest in possession trusts

  2. qualifying interest in possession trusts

  3. relevant property trusts

  4. charitable trusts

  5. trusts for bereaved minors

  6. age 18 to 25 trusts

  7. employee trusts

  8. accumulation trusts

Certainly, it refers both to lifetime trusts, those set up on death and distinguishes between UK resident and non-UK resident trusts insofar as the government wishes to address any remaining opportunities to use non-UK resident trusts, in particular, for tax avoidance or evasion.

Want to access the rest of this story? To read the balance of this article click here (subscription required). This news analysis was first published by LexisPSL Family. To request a free one week trial click here.

The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.