Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Read on

CA v DR (Schedule 1 Children Act 1989: Pension Claim) [2021] EWFC 21

Date:18 MAR 2021
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Family Court, Roberts J, 24 February 2021)

Financial Remedies – Sch 1, Children Act 1989 – Application for pension provision

Financial remedies were granted to the mother in her Sch 1, Children Act 1989 application but the court declined to make a pension provision.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court nd European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.

 


Neutral Citation Number: [2021] EWFC 21

Case No: ZC19P04078

IN THE FAMILY COURT

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL

Date of formal hand down: 24/02/2021


Covid-19 Protocol: This judgment was handed down by Mrs Justice Roberts remotely by circulation to the parties’ representatives by email and release to Bailii. The date and time for hand-down is deemed to be on Wednesday, 24th February 2021, at 10.30 am.

Before :

THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE ROBERTS

---------------------

Between :

CA
Applicant

- and –

DR
Respondent

(SCHEDULE 1 CHILDREN ACT 1989: PENSION CLAIM)

---------------------

Mr Peter Mitchell QC (instructed by [a firm]) for the Applicant
Mr Stewart Leech QC (instructed by [a legal service]) for the Respondent

Hearing dates: 22nd and 23rd February 2021

---------------------

APPROVED JUDGMENT

I direct that no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic.

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.



Court of Protection Practice 2021
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength...
£319.99
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition
£629.99