(Family Court, Mostyn J, 01 November 2021)
Family proceedings – Orders in family proceedings – Variation of order
The Family Division, in an application by the applicant husband to change his financial obligations made under a court order, held that it was unlikely the COVID-19 could be a qualifying event under the case of Barder v Barder [1988] AC 20, [1987] 2 FLR 480, but it would depend on the facts of the case.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.
Subscribers can log in here.
Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
Neutral Citation Number: [2021] EWFC 87
Case No: BV18D07667
IN THE FAMILY COURT
Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 1 November 2021
Before :
MR JUSTICE MOSTYN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between :
BT
Applicant
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Alexander Chandler instructed by Osbornes Law for the Applicant
Amy Kisser instructed by Mills and Reeve for the Respondent
Hearing dates: 7-8 October 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Approved Judgment
.............................
MR JUSTICE MOSTYN
The judge gives permission for this anonymised version of the judgment to be published. No publication or report of the judgment may reveal (1) the identities or residence of the parties or their children, (2) the schools of the children, or (3) the name of the applicant’s business. Breach of this prohibition will amount to a contempt of court.
Judgment: BT v CU [2021] EWFC 87
