Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email emma.reitano@lexisnexis.co.uk.
Spotlight
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families
Children and Same Sex Families: A Legal Handbook
More info
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity
Mental Capacity: Law and Practice
More info
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
Evidence in Family Proceedings
More info
View All
A day in the life Of...
Read on

Adoption in 2014

© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Date:5 MAR 2014

Lucy Sprinz  Barrister One Garden Court

Since the Supreme Court decision in Re B (Care Proceedings: Appeal) [2013] UKSC 33 [2013] 2 FLR 1075 there have been a raft of Court of Appeal decisions stressing that orders contemplating non-consensual adoption are a measure of last resort and emphasising the need for clear and balanced analysis in the evidence provided by local authorities and children's guardians and in the judgments of the court.

This article will consider Re V (Long-Term Fostering or Adoption) [2013] EWCA Civ 913 [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming) K v London Borough of Brent [2013] EWCA Civ 926 [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming) Re G (Care Proceedings: Welfare Evaluation) [2013] EWCA Civ 965 [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming) Re P (Care Proceedings: Balancing Exercise) [2013] EWCA Civ 963 Re B-S (Adoption: Application of s 47(5)) [2013] EWCA Civ 1146 [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming) and Re W (Care Proceedings: Welfare Evaluation) [2013] EWCA Civ 1227 [2014] 1 FLR (forthcoming).

It will analyse why such a high volume...

Read the full article here.

Copyright © 2024 LexisNexis