Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email emma.reitano@lexisnexis.co.uk.
Spotlight

A stark warning in relation to the Validity of Pre-nuptial Agreements

Date:28 MAY 2020

The very recent case of S v H [2020] EWFC B16 (9 January 2020) serves as a stark reminder that there are very strict parameters in which a Court in England and Wales will be willing to consider a pre-nuptial agreement valid and therefore capable of recognition within a financial settlement imposed by the court. 

First a word on the terms used within this short article: ‘validity’ should be taken to mean legally acceptable.  It is not used interchangeably with binding.  Although the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Radmacher (formerly Granatino) v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 significantly changed the status of pre-marital agreements it did not make them automatically binding on parties.  Rather the court made it clear that in the right circumstances ‘the court should give effect to a nuptial agreement that is freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications unless in the circumstances prevailing it would not be fair to hold the parties to their agreement’.  Essentially unless it would be unfair to hold a party to the agreement they had entered into either because of the effect of the agreement or some procedural irregularity the agreement would...

Read the full article in Family Law Journal on L+UK® (subject to subscription) here.

Subscribe to Family Law Journal print here.