(Family Division, Newton J, 13 November 2017)
Public law children – Radicalisation – Long-term planning – Whether children could safely be returned to the father’s care
The judge determined that the children should be gradually rehabilitated to their father’s care.
For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.Subscribers can log in here.Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482.
MR JUSTICE NEWTON
This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.
Case No: FD15P00452
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 2851 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
Date: 13/11/2017
Before :
MR JUSTICE NEWTON
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Between :
A Local Authority
Applicant
- and -
M
First Respondent
- and -
F
Second Respondent
- and -
C, D, E and F
(by their children’s Guardian)
Third to Sixth
Respondents (children)
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ruth Kirby and Zoe Taylor (instructed by A Local Authority) for the Applicant
Richard Doman (instructed by Edwards Duthie Solicitors) for the First Respondent
Ian Peddie QC (instructed by Irvine Thanvi Natas Solicitors) for the Second Respondent
Tara Vindis (instructed by Gary Jacobs Law) for the Third to Sixth Respondents
Hearing dates: 7-25 November 2016
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Judgment
Judgment: A Local Authority v M and Others [2017] EWHC 2851(Fam).rtf
