Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
A Local Authority v M and Others [2017] EWHC 2851 (Fam)
Date:22 NOV 2017
Third slide
Law Reporter

(Family Division, Newton J, 13 November 2017)

Public law children – Radicalisation – Long-term planning – Whether children could safely be returned to the father’s care

The judge determined that the children should be gradually rehabilitated to their father’s care.


For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

MR JUSTICE NEWTON

This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children and members of their family must be strictly preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court.


Case No: FD15P00452
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWHC 2851 (Fam)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 13/11/2017

Before :

MR JUSTICE NEWTON

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Between :

A Local Authority
Applicant

- and -

M
First Respondent

- and -

F
Second Respondent

- and -

C, D, E and F
(by their children’s Guardian)
Third to Sixth 
Respondents (children)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Ruth Kirby and Zoe Taylor (instructed by A Local Authority) for the Applicant
Richard Doman (instructed by Edwards Duthie Solicitors) for the First Respondent
Ian Peddie QC (instructed by Irvine Thanvi Natas Solicitors) for the Second Respondent
Tara Vindis (instructed by Gary Jacobs Law) for the Third to Sixth Respondents

Hearing dates: 7-25 November 2016

 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment 


Judgment: 
A Local Authority v M and Others [2017] EWHC 2851(Fam).rtf

Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts
Emergency Remedies in the Family Courts
"A very good tool for the busy family lawyer"...
£519.99
Family Court Practice, The
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2019 edition due out in May
£559.99
Family Law Reports
Family Law Reports
"The unrivalled and authoritative source of...
£509.99