Barrister St Philip's Chambers, Birmingham
Part 3 of this article considers: the engagement of Cafcass and the social services, status quo arguments, other avenues for the return of a child, the correct approach where there is no pre-existing residence order and the relevance of public law language in retention cases. Parts 1 and 2 were published in May and June issues of Family Law respectively.
To read the rest of this article, see July  Family Law journal.
To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here