Barrister 5 Stone Buildings
In this article Ruth Hughes discusses claims by spouses and cohabitees under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. The recent cases of Musa v Holliday [2013] 1 FLR 806 Lilleyman v Lilleyman [2013] 1 FLR 47 Iqbal v Ahmed [2012] 1 FLR 31 and Cattle v Evans [2011] 2 FLR 843 are all considered in detail. Most important is Lilleyman v Lilleyman which was a decision of Briggs J (as he then was) concerning the hypothetical divorce comparator in the context of an estate with a large portion of non-matrimonial property in the context of a large estate and a short marriage. Ruth also considers the possibility of providing for a spouse or cohabitee's housing need by way of a life interest in a property rather than by making capital provision for a claimant. Ruth argues that the court has began to be more generous to cohabitees and that although a spouse can still expect more generous provision than a cohabitee in a similar position the gap is narrowing. This is perhaps part of a judicial trend which is also...
Read the full article here.