Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce
and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email
emma.reitano@lexisnexis.co.uk.
Pensions on marital breakdown Part 3: case-law – what does it tell us?
© Copyright LexisNexis 2024. All rights reserved.
Beverley Morris
Partner/Solicitor, Collaborative Lawyer, Divorce and Family Law Practice LLP
George Mathieson
Mathieson Consulting
In this article we consider what guidance we can take from reported decisions which have involved pension aspects of a settlement. Prior to legislative enactments, Brooks v Brooks [1996] AC 375, [1995] 2 FLR 13 provided a partial solution where pensions were an issue but its usage was restricted. Brooks had involved an unusual pension scheme and turns on its own facts. The essential points about the pension were:
- it was set up after the marriage, it was therefore clearly post-nuptial;
- the husband was the only member of the scheme - no other beneficiary was involved;
- the wife had earnings of her own from the company which supported a pension for her of the relevant amount.
To log on to Family Law Online or to request a free trial click here
Read the full article here.