Our articles are written by experts in their field and include barristers, solicitors, judges, mediators, academics and professionals from a range of related disciplines. Family Law provides a platform for debate for all the important topics, from divorce and care proceedings to transparency and access to justice. If you would like to contribute please email editor@familylaw.co.uk.
Spotlight
A day in the life Of...
Louisa Gothard
Louisa Gothard
Senior Solicitor, Head of Family Law
Read on
SURROGACY: A v P [2011] EWHC 1738 (Fam)
Date:9 AUG 2011

(Family Division; Theis J; 8 July 2011)

A married couple entered into a surrogacy agreement via an Indian clinic. The agreement was valid in India but was not in England unless the payments to surrogate mother were authorised retrospectively. Five embryos were used, two the product of the married couple's genes and three the product of husband and a donor. The married couple applied for a parental order in respect of the child born to a surrogate mother. The husband then died creating various legal issues.

Held that the evidence clearly demonstrated that the child's welfare needs would be met by the making of the parental order.