Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Latest articles
Re R (Children) (Control of Court Documents) [2021] EWCA Civ 162
(Court of Appeal (Civil Division), King, Peter Jackson, Elisabeth Laing LJJ, 12 February 2021)Practice and Procedure – Disclosure of court documents – Sexual abuse findings –...
AG v VD [2021] EWFC 9
(Family Court, Cohen J, 04 February 2021) Financial Remedies – Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984, Part III – Russian divorceThe wife was awarded just under £6m...
Become the new General Editor of The Family Court Practice, the definitive word on family law and procedure
The Family Court Practice (‘The Red Book’) is widely acknowledged as the leading court reference work for all family practitioners and the judiciary. We are currently recruiting a...
SCTS releases new simplified divorce and dissolution forms for Scotland
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) has released new simplified divorce and dissolution forms of application. As a result of legislation repealing Council Regulation EC 2201/2003, the...
Welsh Government launches consultation on amendments to adoption regulations
The Welsh Government has launched a consultation on the proposed amendments to the Adoption Agencies (Wales) Regulations 2005 and the Care Planning, Placement and Case Review (Wales) Regulations 2015....
View all articles

PROPERTY: Wallbank & Wallbank v Price [2007] EWHC 3001 (Ch)

Sep 29, 2018, 17:38 PM
Slug : wallbank-and-wallbank-v-price-2007-ewhc-3001-ch
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Nov 28, 2007, 04:23 AM
Article ID : 88913

(Chancery Division; 28 November 2007; Lewison J)

The married couple took a transfer of the property under the right to buy scheme, as beneficial joint tenants. A year later, the marriage had broken down; shortly after the wife left the property she signed a handwritten document stating that she revoked any rights in the disposal of the property, but that the couple's daughters should receive her half-share of property on its disposal. When the husband died intestate the wife sought to have the agreement set aside for undue influence, on the basis that she had gone in fear of her husband.

The wife's allegation that the document had been signed because she was frightened of the husband had not been made out. Interpreting the document as a whole, the document was an agreement between the two joint tenants, severing the joint tenancy in equity. Under the agreement the husband thereafter held the beneficial interest in the property on trust as to one half for himself and the other half for himself until disposal of the property, at which time the half share would vest in the daughters; the husband further had a discretion to vest the half share in the daughters' favour before disposal.

Categories :
  • Archive
  • Judgments
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from