Latest articles
UK Immigration Rough Sleeper Rule
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsThe UK government has recently introduced a controversial new set of rules that aim to make rough sleeping grounds for refusal or cancellation of a migrant’s...
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
View all articles

Sir Mark rules celebrities are not an exception in family courts

Sep 29, 2018, 17:48 PM
Slug : sir-mark-rules-celebrities-are-not-an-exception-in-family-courts
Meta Title :
Meta Keywords :
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Jul 16, 2009, 04:24 AM
Article ID : 90727

Cases in the family courts which involve the children of celebrities should be treated no differently as those involving anyone else's children, Sir Mark Potter, President of the Family Division of the High Court ruled yesterday.

The case surrounded a high-profile man and his former partner involved in legal proceedings concerning their children applying to the High Court to exempt celebrities from new rules opening the family courts to the media.

In his judgment, Sir Mark ruled that only the interests of the child, not those of the parents, should be considered in such an application.

However, he said that press interest would be greater in the cases of children of celebrities, with a correspondingly greater need to protect the child.

The case is being strongly contested by a coalition of media organisations, who were granted access to the hearing.

The case is the first in which the Family Division had to consider the new system of media access in the family courts and the rule allowing the exclusion of journalists from all or parts of hearings in certain circumstances.

To download a copy of the judgment, click here.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from