Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2025
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025: entries now open – as well as sponsorship opportunities too!
Celebrating the excellence, resilience, and humanity at the heart of family law.The LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025 are officially open for entries – and with them, a unique opportunity for...
AlphaBiolabs: Bridging the gap – when a hair drug test is not enough
***SPONSORED CONTENT***Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters.Drug testing plays a crucial role...
‘Do they have to know about that?’ Human rights considerations and disclosure
Simon Johnson, Pump Court ChambersThis article examines the difficult and often emotive issue of disclosure of highly personal information about one party to other parties within public law...
Cases of parental death before protective measures – are affirmation of the Children Act’s adaptability?
Avaia Williams, Parklane PlowdenTwo recent family court decisions explore whether the statutory threshold under the Children Act 1989 can be met when parental harm occurs before a child’s birth or...
Supporting and questioning neurodivergent parties in Family Court proceedings
Frances Harris, Harcourt ChambersHelen Little, Harcourt ChambersReflecting on the recent Family Justice Council guidelines on Neurodiversity in the Family Justice System for Practitioners, this...
View all articles
Authors

Resolution response to FLBA/Bar Council Letter

Sep 29, 2018, 22:14 PM
family law, advocacy review, LASPO, legal aid, access to justice, FLBA, bar council
Title : Resolution response to FLBA/Bar Council Letter
Slug : resolution-response-to-flba-bar-council-letter
Meta Keywords : family law, advocacy review, LASPO, legal aid, access to justice, FLBA, bar council
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jul 20, 2015, 05:32 AM
Article ID : 109897
Resolution, and our partners in the family law community, have been holding detailed conversations with the Bar for some time regarding family advocacy work in the post-LASPO landscape.

It is therefore disappointing that the FLBA and the Bar Council have felt it necessary to ask the Minister to commission an independent review. We have not seen any evidence to support the need for this; and indeed, anecdotal reports from our respective members, including barristers and leading judges, do not demonstrate that the concerns expressed in this letter are widespread (and in many areas, they do not exist at all).

Resolution, together with our partners, are of the view that any quality issues are best addressed by the profession through training and accreditation for the Bar and solicitors. We wish to continue to work with the FLBA and the Bar Council to this end, as we have offered throughout.

At a time of significant challenge for legal aid practitioners, another review of the support they provide to vulnerable people is neither warranted nor helpful.

Resolution is currently working with our partners to provide a full response to the Bar’s letter to the Minister.

The FLBA and Bar Council letter is available to read here.

Resolution's response to the Minister is available to read here.
Categories :
  • News
Tags :
announcements
Authors
Provider : Resolution
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products