Spotlight
Court of Protection Practice 2025
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articlesrss feeds
Is it time to conjoin children and financial remedy proceedings in relocation cases?
Prof David Hodson OBE KC(Hons) MCIArb, Solicitor (England and Australia), mediator, arbitrator Ann Thomas, Solicitor and mediatorFor over 30 years, English family law has maintained a clear...
LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025: entries now open – as well as sponsorship opportunities too!
Celebrating the excellence, resilience, and humanity at the heart of family law.The LexisNexis Family Law Awards 2025 are officially open for entries – and with them, a unique opportunity for...
AlphaBiolabs: Bridging the gap – when a hair drug test is not enough
***SPONSORED CONTENT***Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters.Drug testing plays a crucial role...
‘Do they have to know about that?’ Human rights considerations and disclosure
Simon Johnson, Pump Court ChambersThis article examines the difficult and often emotive issue of disclosure of highly personal information about one party to other parties within public law...
Cases of parental death before protective measures – are affirmation of the Children Act’s adaptability?
Avaia Williams, Parklane PlowdenTwo recent family court decisions explore whether the statutory threshold under the Children Act 1989 can be met when parental harm occurs before a child’s birth or...
View all articles
Authors

Reform of Judicial Review

Sep 29, 2018, 22:14 PM
judicial review, decision making, costs capping orders
Title : Reform of Judicial Review
Slug : reform-of-judicial-review
Meta Keywords : judicial review, decision making, costs capping orders
Canonical URL : http://www.jordanpublishing.co.uk/practice-areas/family/news_and_comment/reform-of-judicial-review
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Check Copyright Text : No
Date : Jul 22, 2015, 07:08 AM
Article ID : 109921
The government has launched a consultation to assess how to achieve greater transparency in how judicial reviews are funded.

Overview

Judicial review is a process by which individuals, businesses and other affected parties can challenge the lawfulness of decisions or actions of public bodies, including those of Ministers, local authorities and those exercising public functions.
It is a largely judge-developed process and can be characterised as the rule of law in action, providing a key mechanism for individuals to hold the Executive to account.

Why the government is consulting

The government’s intention is to have greater transparency in how judicial reviews are funded, limiting the potential for third-party funders to avoid their appropriate liability for litigation costs and making sure that when costs capping orders are made – limiting or extinguishing a party’s costs liability – they are made in appropriate cases.

This consultation follows an earlier consultation that ran between September and November 2013, and which can be found alongside the government response at https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/judicial-review. The government committed to introducing a number of reforms, including in relation to the provision of information on the funding of judicial reviews and replacing the protective costs order regime with a new system of costs capping orders.

Parliament subsequently legislated for these specific reforms in sections 85 to 90 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015. During the passage of the Act through Parliament, the government committed to running a consultation about the provision of financial information to the court on application for judicial review to make sure courts would have the information they need when deciding how to award costs. This consultation gives effect to that commitment, and the government is also consulting on the financial information that should be provided on application for a costs capping order.

To implement these reforms, provision in the Civil Procedure Rules and Tribunal Procedure Rules is required. This consultation paper seeks views on the government’s proposals for the rules setting out the financial information required from a claimant with the application for judicial review and when applying for a costs capping order. It seeks views on the proposals for rules to set out that:
  1. a declaration of funding sources is required on an application for permission;
  2. details of third-party funding or likely funding in connection with an application for judicial review need not be provided where the funding is below a threshold of £1,500; and
  3. a more detailed picture of the applicant’s financial circumstances is required on application for a costs capping order than on application for permission.
The consultation runs from 21 July 2015 to 15 September 2015.

Click here to submit your views.

Click here to view the consultation document.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
MOJ
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles