Spotlight
Family Law Awards 2020
Shortlist announced - time to place your vote!
Court of Protection Practice 2020
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
Hundreds of thousands of companies worldwide fall victims to hackers every year. Is your firm one of them?
SPONSORED CONTENT Image source: Information is beautifulYou and other lawyers and legal assistants in your firm likely have accounts on the hacked websites listed in the image above. If a hacker...
New complaints handling guide offers advice to local authorities
The Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman is today issuing new guidance on effective complaint handling for local authorities.Based on previous documents, the new guide offers practical,...
EU laws continue until at least 2038 and beyond
The UK left the EU on 31 January 2020.  But in matters of law it fully leaves on 31 December 2020.  But EU laws will continue to apply, and be applied, in the English family courts from 1...
Family Law Awards winners announced in virtual awards ceremony
The winners of the Family Law Awards 2020 were announced at 4pm during a much-anticipated virtual awards ceremony. Over the past ten years, the Family Law Awards has recognised the leading players in...
Behaviour-based divorces still merit close consideration
Some recent cases illustrate the evidential and procedural issues involved in dealing with proofs on the merits of divorce, which are worth considering even though most cases may conclude on a...
View all articles
Authors

Re J (Contact Orders: Procedure) [2018] EWCA Civ 115

Sep 29, 2018, 22:11 PM
Private law children - Contact – Procedure – Fact-finding – Order for no contact – Whether a fact-finding hearing should have been directed
The father’s appeal from the decision ordering no contact with the three children was allowed but the judge’s order was reaffirmed.
Slug : re-j-contact-orders-procedure-2018-ewca-civ-115
Meta Title : Re J (Contact Orders: Procedure) [2018] EWCA Civ 115
Meta Keywords : Private law children - Contact – Procedure – Fact-finding – Order for no contact – Whether a fact-finding hearing should have been directed
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 21, 2018, 08:13 AM
Article ID : 116367

(Court of Appeal, McFarlane, King LJJ, 6 February 2018)

Private law children Contact – Procedure – Fact-finding – Order for no contact – Whether a fact-finding hearing should have been directed

The father’s appeal from the decision ordering no contact with the three children was allowed but the judge’s order was reaffirmed.




For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 115
Case No: B4/2016/3559/CCFMF
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM MANCHESTER COUNTY AND FAMILY COURT
HIS HONOUR JUDGE ALLWEIS

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 06/02/2018
Before :


LORD JUSTICE McFARLANE


and


LADY JUSTICE KING




J (CHILDREN)


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


The Appellant Father (in person assisted by a McKenzie Friend)
The Respondent Mother not attending
The representatives of the child (NYAS) not attending

Hearing date : 11 October 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved

Judgment: 
Re J (Contact Orders Procedure) [2018] EWCA Civ 115.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from