Spotlight
Family Court Practice, The
Order the 2021 edition due out in May
Court of Protection Practice 2021
'Court of Protection Practice goes from strength to strength, having...
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance Tenth Edition
Jackson's Matrimonial Finance is an authoritative specialist text...
Spotlight
Latest articles
One in four family lawyers contemplates leaving the profession, Resolution reveals
A quarter of family justice professionals are on the verge of quitting the profession as the toll of lockdown on their mental health becomes clear, the family law group Resolution revealed today,...
Family Law Awards adds a Wellbeing Award - enter now
This past year has been different for everyone, but family law professionals working on the front line of family justice have faced a more challenging, stressful and demanding time than most. To...
Pension sharing orders: Finch v Baker
The Court of Appeal judgment in Finch v Baker [2021] EWCA Civ 72 was released on 28 January 2021. The judgment provides some useful guidance on not being able to get what are essentially...
Eight things you need to know: Personal Injury damages in divorce cases
The “pre-acquired” or “non-matrimonial” argument is one which has taken up much commentary in family law circles over recent years.  However, the conundrum can be even...
Misogyny as a hate crime – what it means and why it’s needed
In recent weeks, the government announced that it will instruct all police forces across the UK to start recording crimes motivated by sex or gender on an experimental basis- effectively making...
View all articles
Authors

Re J (Contact Orders: Procedure) [2018] EWCA Civ 115

Sep 29, 2018, 22:11 PM
Private law children - Contact – Procedure – Fact-finding – Order for no contact – Whether a fact-finding hearing should have been directed
The father’s appeal from the decision ordering no contact with the three children was allowed but the judge’s order was reaffirmed.
Slug : re-j-contact-orders-procedure-2018-ewca-civ-115
Meta Title : Re J (Contact Orders: Procedure) [2018] EWCA Civ 115
Meta Keywords : Private law children - Contact – Procedure – Fact-finding – Order for no contact – Whether a fact-finding hearing should have been directed
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Feb 21, 2018, 08:13 AM
Article ID : 116367

(Court of Appeal, McFarlane, King LJJ, 6 February 2018)

Private law children Contact – Procedure – Fact-finding – Order for no contact – Whether a fact-finding hearing should have been directed

The father’s appeal from the decision ordering no contact with the three children was allowed but the judge’s order was reaffirmed.




For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important Family Division, Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European courts case, subscribe to Family Law Reports.

Subscribers can log in here.

Find out more or request a free 1-week trial of the Family Law Reports. Please quote: 100482. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 115
Case No: B4/2016/3559/CCFMF
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM MANCHESTER COUNTY AND FAMILY COURT
HIS HONOUR JUDGE ALLWEIS

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL


Date: 06/02/2018
Before :


LORD JUSTICE McFARLANE


and


LADY JUSTICE KING




J (CHILDREN)


- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -


The Appellant Father (in person assisted by a McKenzie Friend)
The Respondent Mother not attending
The representatives of the child (NYAS) not attending

Hearing date : 11 October 2017

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Judgment Approved

Judgment: 
Re J (Contact Orders Procedure) [2018] EWCA Civ 115.rtf
Categories :
  • Judgments
  • Private Law Children
Tags :
FLR_cover
Provider :
Product Bucket : Family
Recommend These Products
Related Articles
Load more comments
Comment by from