Latest articles
Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust v DV (A Child) [2021] EWHC 1037 (Fam)
(Family Division, Cohen J, 19 April 2021)Medical Treatment – 17-year-old had form of bone cancer and required surgery For comprehensive, judicially approved coverage of every important...
Domestic Abuse Bill
Aaron Gates-Lincoln, Immigration NewsAfter years of development the Domestic Abuse Bill returned to the House of Lords in the UK on the 8th March 2021 to complete its report stage, one of the final...
Coercive control and children’s welfare in Re H-N and Others
When families come to strife, arrangements must be made for the future care of any children. In some circumstances, this means an application to the courts. These ‘private law orders’ can...
Profession: Expert Witness
The value of a family business or business interest is treated as an asset and therefore part of the matrimonial pot to be distributed when it comes to negotiating a financial settlement on divorce or...
How does a jointly held property pass on death?
When meeting with clients to discuss their succession planning, many cannot recall whether their property is held jointly as joint tenants or jointly as tenants in common. The distinction is that with...
View all articles
Authors

President sets out how the Court of Protection should handle deprivation of liberty applications

Sep 29, 2018, 22:02 PM
court of protection, family law, cheshire west, deprivation of liberty, DoL, Re X and Others (Deprivation of Liberty) [2014] EWCOP 25
Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division, has today handed down the long-awaited post-Cheshire ruling, examining the practical and procedural implications for the Court of Protection following the large increase in its case load following the Supreme Court's decision.
Slug : president-sets-out-how-the-Court-of-Protection-should-handle-deprivation-of-liberty-applications
Meta Title : President sets out how the Court of Protection should handle deprivation of liberty applications
Meta Keywords : court of protection, family law, cheshire west, deprivation of liberty, DoL, Re X and Others (Deprivation of Liberty) [2014] EWCOP 25
Canonical URL :
Trending Article : No
Prioritise In Trending Articles : No
Date : Aug 7, 2014, 04:18 AM
Article ID : 106663
Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division, has today handed down the long-awaited post-Cheshire ruling, setting out how the Court of Protection should handle deprivation of liberty applications

In his judgment, Re X and Others (Deprivation of Liberty) [2014] EWCOP 25, Sir James Munby emphasises that his decision is not an analysis of the Cheshire West decision, but is instead focused on the 'very significant increase in the number of cases in the Court of Protection relating to deprivation of liberty'.

'The immediate objective, in my judgment, is to devise, if this is feasible, a standardised, and so far as possible ‘streamlined’, process, compatible with all the requirements of Article 5, which will enable the Court of Protection to deal with all DoL cases in a timely but just and fair way. The process needs, if this is feasible, to distinguish between those DoL cases that can properly be dealt with on the papers, and without an oral hearing, and those that require an oral hearing.' (para [5])
At the initial directions hearing on 8 May 2014, Sir James Munby, with the assistance of counsel, formulated 25 questions as to how the Court of Protection should handle deprivation of liberty applications. 

In Re X, the President's preliminary judgment, he addresses most of his questions, concentrating on the issues directly related to his 'streamlining' objective.

The full judgment, including the 25 question Annex, is available to download here.  

An in-depth analysis of the judgment, by Jess Flanagan of Clarke Willmott, will be published by Family Law shortly.

Categories :
  • News
Tags :
key_lock
Provider :
Product Bucket :
Recommend These Products
Load more comments
Comment by from